Return to:Office of Education : Academic Health Center : myU : U of M Home

Gold University of Minnesota M. Skip to main content. Link to University of Minnesota homepage
gray whats inside banner
For Faculty

For Students

Interprofessional Education

Community-Based Programs

Development, Review, and Approval of Academic Programs

Staff Publications and Presentations

Mission and Guiding Principles

Academy for Excellence

Minnesota Workforce Resources

 

  Education Home

Office of Education Programs
CIPE
CHIP
Health Careers Center
IERC
AHC Learning Commons
MN AHEC

Home > For Faculty > Promotion and Tenure > Clinical Scholar Statements > Neurology Clinical Scholar Statement

Printer-friendly version   Email this page to a friend

Neurology Clinical Scholar Statement



Approved 9/1/05

Department of Neurology

Appointment and Promotion Criteria for Full Time Clinical Scholar Track

Overview

To accomplish it missions in education, clinical service, and research, the Neurology Department relies on diverse talents among its faculty members. The traditional tenure track is best suited to measure and reward faculty who spend most time (e.g. >50%) in research, especially at the discovery (basic science) and translational stages. The full time clinical scholar track is intended for faculty spending less time in research and whose important contributions are in education, clinical service, and citizenship. At the time of appointment, faculty will typically be assigned to the traditional tenure track or the clinical scholar track. Reassignment from one track to the other is possible.

Academic progress will be evaluated by a similar process for all faculty members. Each year, typically in the third quarter of the academic year (January through March), there will be an academic merit review. Each faculty member will prepare a report detailing his/her activities during the year. The report will be submitted to the Merit Review Committee. The Committee will be comprised of senior faculty members. Its constituency will vary depending on the track of the faculty member under review. Specifically, it will be comprised of senior tenure track faculty when a tenure track faculty member is being reviewed. It will be comprised of both senior tenure track and senior clinical scholar track faculty when a clinical scholar track faculty member is being reviewed. The Merit Review Committee will report to the Department Head. The Department Head will provide feedback and negotiate goals for the next academic year. This meeting will be an appropriate forum for discussion of promotion. Criteria for appointment and promotion are already in place for Tenure Track faculty (required by section 7-12). Full Time Non-regular faculty may be appointed and evaluated using either the Tenure Track or the Full Time Clinical Scholar Track criteria as agreed upon at the time of hiring, however tenure is not available at this time to non-regular faculty.

Criteria for Appointment to the Full Time Clinical Scholar Track

Faculty will typically be appointed at the assistant professor level if there is clear indication of potential for advancing in the clinical scholar track. In other circumstances appointment at the instructor level may be appropriate for a trial period.

Criteria for Promotion

Associate Professor

Faculty will be recommended for promotion to associate professor when then have satisfied relevant department and university criteria. All members of the Full-time Clinical Scholar track will be expected to be active clinicians as well as teachers or educators. They may also be heavily involved in clinical or health services research and clinical program development. Distinction must be demonstrated in at least two areas to warrant recommendation for promotion:

1. Patient care/service - examples:

evidence of at least regional reputation for clinical expertise (e.g. referrals, participation in

clinical subspecialty organizations, recognized authority in a skill or an area of

knowledge) significant clinical program development (e.g. diagnosis-, treatment- or

disease-based clinical programs) significant quality improvement program development

significant contributions in public service (e.g. efforts benefiting patient groups and

general public)

2. Education - examples:

local reputation for outstanding teaching or education (e.g. teaching awards)

regional or national recognition for teaching or education contributions (e.g. appointment

to education organizations)

significant curriculum development (e.g. undergraduate, graduate, postgraduate)

significant educational administration (e.g. course directorship, program directorship)

significant scholarly work (e.g. reviews, chapters, other education materials)

3. Research - examples:

significant productivity in basic science, translational, clinical, health services, education

research acknowledged by peer review (e.g. publications, grant receipt, participation in

trials)

4. Leadership - examples:

significant leadership in University and hospital affairs

significant leadership in local, regional, or national medical affairs (e.g. societies,

associations, organizations)

Professor

All members of the Full-time Clinical Scholar track will be expected to be active clinicians as well as teachers or educators. Continuing significant contribution bringing distinction to the candidate and University in the areas above is required to satisfy criteria for recommendation for promotion to professor.


Feedback | Notice of Privacy Practices

 
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.